Yu’s 40 Explosive Proofs! Tianyu Silences a Top Executive? Inside the Scandal of the “Private Banquet” (NH)

Chinese actor Alan Yu aka Yu Menglong's final text surfaces after death, raises foul play suspicions: 'They may come and kill me anytime'

Yu’s 40 Explosive Proofs! Tianyu Silences a Top Executive? Inside the Scandal of the “Private Banquet”

Introduction

The entertainment world was rocked again this week when actor Yu Menglong reportedly revealed “forty explosive pieces of evidence” connected to his ongoing conflict with entertainment giant Tianyu.
The claims suggest not only corporate manipulation and intimidation but also a mysterious “private banquet” allegedly hosted by top executives—an event that has since become the center of swirling speculation online.

The term “body banquet,” which went viral overnight, was quickly replaced by the more cautious phrase private banquet as social media moderators raced to contain sensational discussions.
Yet the public appetite for answers continues to grow. What really happened behind closed doors? And why did one executive’s sudden disappearance from public view ignite a storm of suspicion?

This is a deep dive into one of the most talked-about controversies in Chinese showbiz—a story of power, loyalty, silence, and the fight for truth.

Part I — The Calm Before Yu’s Revelation

For months, rumors surrounded Tianyu Entertainment’s internal conflicts. Disputes over contracts, mistreated employees, and artistic control had long been whispered about but rarely confirmed.

Yu Menglong, known for his composure and restraint, had stayed silent while his fans defended him from online attacks.
Then, in a shocking twist, Yu released a series of documents, screenshots, and recordings—his “forty proofs.”

Each piece of evidence seemed to build a larger picture of intimidation, secret meetings, and attempts to manipulate public perception.

Part II — The Forty Proofs: What He Claims to Know

The “forty proofs” range from financial statements to internal memos and private messages.
Yu’s team insists that the documents show patterns of unfair contracts, hidden clauses, and deliberate attempts to suppress certain artists’ careers.

One of the most explosive claims involves an unnamed senior executive who allegedly tried to expose internal wrongdoing—and was abruptly removed from her post.

Though no official confirmation has been made, the timeline of her disappearance from public events raised eyebrows across the industry.

Part III — Tianyu’s Internal Turmoil

Insiders describe the atmosphere within Tianyu as tense and paranoid.
After Yu’s revelations, several mid-level managers reportedly went offline, deleting social accounts and avoiding public appearances.

An internal memo urging “discipline and unified messaging” was circulated among staff, warning against sharing unverified information.
Despite this, anonymous posts from alleged employees continued to appear online, claiming that “truth cannot be hidden forever.”

The sense of fear and uncertainty grew with each passing day.

Part IV — The Vanishing Executive

The sudden absence of one senior executive—known for her previous defense of Yu Menglong—became a focal point of public concern.
While Tianyu stated she was on “extended personal leave,” observers noted the lack of any direct communication or media appearance from her side.

Fans began asking difficult questions: Was she forced out? Was she pressured into silence?
Without answers, speculation filled the void. Online discussions exploded, turning the missing executive into a symbol of corporate secrecy and control.

Part V — The “Private Banquet” Allegations

Among the most sensational claims was talk of a “private banquet,” an exclusive event allegedly attended by high-ranking company figures and select guests.
While the term “body banquet” circulated briefly online, it was soon replaced by the sanitized version as moderators removed speculative content.

Yu’s followers claim the event represented “a culture of intimidation and exploitation,” though no official investigation has confirmed any misconduct.
Still, the phrase became shorthand for corruption and excess—an emblem of how power operates in the shadows of fame.

Part VI — The Fan Response and Public Pressure

The online backlash was swift.
Millions of fans rallied behind Yu Menglong, demanding transparency from Tianyu.
They created detailed timelines, cross-referenced Yu’s “forty proofs,” and mobilized massive social-media campaigns calling for industry reform.

Petitions emerged urging regulators to investigate entertainment contracts and protect creative workers.
For many ordinary citizens, Yu’s struggle resonated beyond celebrity gossip—it became a metaphor for standing up against powerful systems.

Part VII — Media Blackouts and Controlled Narratives

As the movement grew, state-affiliated media outlets remained largely silent. Entertainment news segments briefly mentioned “internal disputes,” but avoided Yu’s name entirely.
Industry insiders whispered about “content guidelines” that discouraged coverage of the case.

Meanwhile, independent commentators used coded language to discuss the issue, describing it as “the forty lights” or “the quiet storm.”
This digital cat-and-mouse game reflected a deeper truth: control over information is itself a battleground.

Part VIII — Legal and Ethical Implications

Lawyers and ethics experts began dissecting the controversy from multiple angles.
If Yu’s documents are authentic, they could expose violations of labor law and unfair competition.
If they are fabricated or exaggerated, he could face serious defamation claims.

For Tianyu, the stakes are equally high. Allegations of coercion, confidentiality breaches, and internal retaliation could trigger both legal and regulatory consequences.

Either way, the case highlights the blurred line between loyalty and suppression in corporate environments.

Part IX — Global Reaction and Industry Fallout

International observers watched closely.
Trade magazines, entertainment analysts, and fan communities across Asia interpreted Yu’s actions as a rare act of defiance in a system known for silence.

Foreign sponsors reportedly postponed projects with Tianyu until the controversy settles.
Meanwhile, Yu’s global fan base expanded dramatically, seeing him as both artist and advocate.

The scandal may have damaged reputations—but it also reshaped narratives of courage and accountability.

Part X — Lessons for the Future of Entertainment

The Yu Menglong–Tianyu saga has become a turning point for the Chinese entertainment industry.
It exposed the fragility of trust between artists, corporations, and audiences. It also reminded everyone that in the digital era, transparency isn’t optional—it’s demanded.

Artists are learning to document everything; fans are learning to organize; and companies are learning that silence can be more costly than truth.

The age of quiet compliance may be ending—and with it, the old rules of control.

Conclusion

Yu Menglong’s forty proofs lit a fire that even the largest corporation could not contain.
By speaking up, he shattered the myth of invincibility surrounding the industry’s power brokers.

The mysterious “private banquet,” the missing executive, and the wave of public outrage all point to a single reality: people are no longer content to watch passively.
They want fairness, transparency, and dignity—values that no amount of influence can suppress.

The storm has not ended, but its message is already clear: truth, once revealed, cannot be silenced.

When Artists Speak: The Rise of Corporate Accountability in Chinese Showbiz
Inside Tianyu’s Empire: Power, Silence, and the Price of Loyalty
The Forty Proofs Phenomenon: How Digital Activism Rewrites the Rules