Not too long ago, vlogger Sir Jack was known for spreading smiles online. His videos were filled with humor, motivation, and simple stories about life and business. People admired his resilience, his lighthearted attitude, and his ability to inspire others despite his speech impediment—a cleft lip and palate that made his voice distinct and memorable.

But recently, everything changed. Sir Jack, once a symbol of positivity, has become a lightning rod for controversy after joining the circle of political commentators known as the “Banateros.” His latest videos—angry, expletive-laden tirades against former Senator Antonio Trillanes—left even his longtime supporters stunned.

And now, vlogger Chris Ulo has decided to speak up.

From Good Vibes to Political Venom

In his video, Chris Ulo opens with disbelief. “I used to watch Sir Jack,” he says. “His content was fun—positive, even inspiring. But now, I don’t recognize him.”

Once known for good-natured jokes and stories about his athletic past and business ventures, Sir Jack now uses his platform to hurl insults, particularly at opposition figures like Trillanes. His recent rant—filled with profanity and baseless accusations—pushed many to question what happened to the man they once admired.

Chris clarifies that he doesn’t criticize Sir Jack’s political opinions. “He has every right to support whoever he wants,” he says. “But it’s how he speaks—how ugly and unnecessary it’s become—that’s sad.”

“Bingot, Ngongo” — Not as an Insult, but a Point of Truth

Chris Ulo is careful to draw a line: he’s not mocking Sir Jack’s condition. In fact, he repeatedly says he pities him. “Let’s be clear—I’m not calling him names,” Chris explains. “I’m just describing reality. He’s bingot, or ngongo. His words are already hard to understand. So why make them uglier by adding curses?”

It’s a brutal observation—but it’s also a human one. Chris argues that using profanity, especially with a speech condition, makes the message even harder to process. “If I had that problem,” he says, “I’d choose my words carefully. I wouldn’t waste them on PI and curses.”

To Chris, it’s not just about how Sir Jack sounds—it’s about what he’s doing to himself. “He used to make people happy. Now people can’t even understand what he’s angry about.”

The Profanity Problem

In one clip, Sir Jack can be seen cursing repeatedly while calling Trillanes “evil” and “a traitor.” Chris pauses the video and shakes his head. “You’re talking about respect for the country, but you can’t even respect your own mouth,” he says.

For Chris, the issue isn’t politics—it’s self-respect. “There’s a way to criticize without losing your dignity,” he adds. “But when you shout PI every other sentence, you lose both your argument and your credibility.”

It’s a painful truth that many of Sir Jack’s followers have quietly agreed with. In comment sections once filled with laughter and support, people now express confusion, even embarrassment. “We followed him for good vibes,” one fan wrote. “Now all he gives us is hate.”

The Lies That Followed

Beyond tone and language, Chris Ulo also tackles the content of Sir Jack’s political claims—and exposes them as false.

In one video, Sir Jack accuses Trillanes of buying votes in Caloocan during the last election. Chris debunks this quickly. “Trillanes lost the election,” he points out. “There were no Comelec reports, no media coverage—nothing. Where did Sir Jack get this information? From Facebook comments?”

Then came an even wilder claim: that Trillanes “sold” the West Philippine Sea and Scarborough Shoal to China. Chris’s reaction is immediate disbelief. “A senator can’t sell national territory,” he says firmly. “It doesn’t belong to him. If he did that, don’t you think China or Duterte’s allies would’ve used it against him by now?”

The claims crumble under scrutiny. What remains, Chris says, is a sad picture: a once-admired vlogger now repeating propaganda without facts, spreading misinformation to please a certain political crowd.

The Fall of a Familiar Voice

What struck many viewers about Chris Ulo’s video wasn’t anger—it was pity. His tone carried disappointment, even a kind of mourning.

“I’m not here to insult him,” he says. “I’m here to say, I pity him. Because he doesn’t see what he’s become.”

Chris argues that Sir Jack’s transformation reflects something larger happening online—a wave of once-neutral creators turning into mouthpieces for political groups, abandoning their values for clout and validation. “It’s sad when someone who used to inspire ends up becoming the thing he once mocked,” he adds.

And for Sir Jack, whose unique voice once symbolized courage, that fall from grace feels even heavier.

A Lesson in Respect and Responsibility

By the end of the video, Chris Ulo’s message goes beyond one man. He uses Sir Jack’s story as a mirror for all online influencers. “Freedom of speech doesn’t mean freedom from decency,” he says. “If you want to talk politics, fine—but don’t forget the humanity in your words.”

He reminds creators that audiences remember not just what you say, but how you say it. “You can disagree with Trillanes or any politician. You can criticize government. But once your words turn toxic, no one listens—they just laugh.”

It’s a hard truth, but one that resonates. In the end, Chris’s critique is less about politics and more about choices—the choice between pride and humility, between outrage and respect.

Sir Jack may have gained new followers among the Banateros, but he’s lost something far more important: credibility, grace, and the goodwill of people who once admired him.

“Profanity doesn’t make your argument stronger,” Chris concludes. “It just shows how weak it really is.”