The walls of the Senate chamber, usually reserved for measured deliberations, trembled with tension when Pasig Mayor Vico Sotto delivered a statement that echoed far beyond politics: “Umamin na si Discaya.” And this was not just a verbal slip—it was a bombshell that exposed a network of multiple bidding, ghost contractors, and luxury cars linked to the Discaya family.

It all started with the Senate Blue Ribbon Committee probing flood control contracts. These are mega national projects—billions in public funds meant to protect communities. However, Vico Sotto’s disclosures took the probe to another level. He emphasized that the Discayas admitted to owning nine construction firms—Alpha and Omega, St. Gerrard, among others—that often competed against each other during bidding. This, he explained, undermines the spirit of fair competition and transparency in public contracting.

As the statement circulated, a wave of public outrage erupted. Protesters began gathering outside Discaya-owned properties, hurling mud, chanting for accountability, and demanding justice. The mood was tense, but Mayor Sotto urged calm—pointing out that violence would harm not only the powerful, but guards and workers as well.

Behind the scenes, several national agencies swung into action. The Pasig City government began coordinating with agencies like the BOC and BIR, preparing criminal and administrative action not only for the Discayas but also for other entities suspected of misdeeds.

While the spotlight shone bright on the admission of owning nine firms, the implications went deeper: ghost firms, questionable bidding, and the public’s sense of trust in governance started unraveling under scrutiny.

Despite the explosive revelation, Vico Sotto made clear he believed in institutional processes. He was even reportedly willing to testify in person at the Senate if required. His push for transparency wasn’t just a political move—it tapped into a deeper desire: that no one, no matter how influential, should be above the law.

The magnitude of contracts claimed by the Discayas is staggering—comparable to those awarded to only a handful of contractors, surpassing expectations and raising financial red flags.

What’s at stake?

Public Faith in Governance
Flood control projects are vital. When contractors sidestep fairness, the public pays—in safety, in trust, in broken systems.

Journalistic Integrity in the Spotlight
Vico also reignited debate on media ethics, especially when broadcasters featured the Discayas before campaign season, allegedly as paid placements.

Political Ramifications Beyond Pasig
Sarah Discaya, once the challenger, is now tainted not just politically but legally and publicly. The fallout could reshape local political maps.

Whether Justice Will be Served
With multiple agencies looking into the web of bids, contracts, and assets including luxury vehicles, it remains to be seen if this turns into real accountability.

Conclusion

Mayor Vico Sotto’s declaration—“Umamin na si Discaya!”—was more than a news headline. It marked the start of a reckoning, a test of institutions, and a reminder that in democracy, no one is untouchable.

As the investigation continues, one question looms: Will the truth lead to real reform—or will power find a way to slip through?