November 28, 2025

Introduction

The sudden passing of actor Yu Menglong in September left fans, colleagues, and the wider entertainment community in shock. Widely admired for his talent and charisma, Yu Menglong’s death was initially reported as a natural, though tragic, loss. Yet, in the weeks following, an unexpected and controversial narrative emerged: a spiritual medium claimed to have communicated with the late actor’s spirit, revealing tearful insights into the circumstances of his death and allegedly naming a “mastermind” behind the situation.

The medium’s statements, delivered in an emotionally charged session later shared online, have reignited conversations about grief, responsibility, and the intersection of celebrity culture with paranormal practices. While authorities have not verified any of the claims, the story has captured public attention, raising questions about truth, belief, and the ethics of revealing intimate details about the deceased through spiritual channels.

This report presents a comprehensive view of the story, contextualizing the claims within Chinese cultural beliefs, social media dynamics, and journalistic ethics. It does not assert the medium’s revelations as fact but seeks to explore the broader implications of this unusual case.

1. Yu Menglong: A Beloved Actor and Public Figure

Yu Menglong, also known by fans as “Alan Yu,” was recognized not only for his acting versatility but also for his musical talents and engagement with fans. Over a decade, he had appeared in multiple television dramas, stage performances, and web series, earning a reputation for professionalism and charm. His fanbase spanned multiple regions, and his social media presence was both influential and affectionate, with followers celebrating his career and personal milestones.

Beyond his career achievements, Yu Menglong’s character was often highlighted as humble, approachable, and attentive to his supporters. Colleagues describe him as diligent, empathetic, and driven — qualities that amplified the shock and mourning following his death.

The suddenness of his passing in September created a vacuum of information, leading fans to seek understanding through both conventional news and unconventional avenues. In the absence of complete official explanations, a cultural space exists where mediums and spiritual communication become focal points for grief and speculation.

Yu Menglong’s legacy, therefore, is not solely his body of work but also the emotional imprint he left on fans, making the subsequent spiritual narrative all the more compelling for the public.

2. The Emergence of the Medium

Shortly after Yu Menglong’s passing, reports surfaced of a medium claiming to have received messages from the actor’s spirit. This medium, whose identity is known within certain spiritual circles, positioned themselves as a conduit capable of conveying messages from the deceased.

Mediumship, while controversial and often debated, occupies a notable place in East Asian culture, particularly in Chinese traditions where rituals for the deceased and spiritual intercession are common. Mediums are sometimes consulted to provide closure, guidance, or explanations that extend beyond the physical realm.

In this case, the medium’s emergence coincided with heightened public interest and social media activity surrounding Yu Menglong’s death. Their session reportedly took place in a private setting, later circulated online through clips and screenshots. Emotional displays, including sobbing and expressions of grief, characterized the session, which contributed to the story’s viral spread.

Observers note that the medium did not claim to offer definitive evidence, but instead framed the communication as a personal, spiritual experience intended to honor Yu Menglong. Nevertheless, the combination of celebrity, emotion, and alleged revelation created a potent mix for public curiosity.

3. The Alleged Revelation: Tears and Emotional Confessions

According to eyewitness accounts of the session, the medium broke down multiple times while recounting messages purportedly from Yu Menglong. The actor allegedly expressed feelings of sadness, frustration, and unfulfilled wishes. Specific anecdotes included references to his experiences in the final months of life, personal reflections, and messages intended for loved ones.

The emotional intensity of the session became a focal point, with viewers and online commentators interpreting the medium’s sobbing as both authenticity and dramatic emphasis. In Chinese and broader East Asian contexts, expressions of grief are often culturally coded, and the visible display of emotion can signify sincerity and respect.

Crucially, the medium emphasized that the revelations were intended to offer closure and remembrance, rather than to incite controversy. The emotional framing of the session blurred the line between spiritual disclosure and public performance, raising questions about interpretation, perception, and responsibility.

4. The Mastermind Claim: What Was Reported

Perhaps the most controversial element of the session was the medium’s claim that a “mastermind” was connected to Yu Menglong’s death. Specific names, motivations, or evidence were not independently verified, and authorities have made no public statements corroborating this allegation.

Experts in law and ethics caution against taking such claims as factual, noting that spiritual communications cannot serve as legal evidence. Nevertheless, the narrative was picked up widely on social media, leading to speculation, debates, and further dissemination of unverified claims.

The claim of a mastermind, whether symbolic or literal, highlights the tension between personal belief systems and public accountability. For fans seeking answers, the allure of a revealed “truth” is understandable, but its unverified nature requires careful contextualization.

5. Public and Social Media Reactions

Within hours of the session’s online circulation, fans reacted in varied ways. Some expressed empathy for the medium and shared messages of remembrance for Yu Menglong. Others questioned the authenticity of the session, suggesting potential exaggeration or performative aspects.

Social media analysis shows that viral narratives often amplify emotionally charged content, particularly when celebrity deaths are involved. Discussions included debates over spiritual practices, cultural interpretations of mediumship, and ethical concerns regarding publicly naming alleged culprits without verification.

Netizens also engaged in collective mourning, creating hashtags, fan art, and tribute posts. The episode reflects how grief, curiosity, and digital virality intersect in modern celebrity culture.

6. Skepticism and Expert Opinions

Psychologists and paranormal researchers highlight that mediumship experiences are subjective, influenced by memory, emotional states, and social context. Emotional intensity, such as crying, can lend perceived credibility, though it does not provide factual confirmation.

Skeptics argue that viral spread of unverified claims can misinform the public and potentially harm individuals if names or implications are taken as truth. Legal analysts reinforce that no spiritual communication constitutes legal evidence, and that accusations made without corroboration may risk defamation.

Experts recommend distinguishing between spiritual interpretations, anecdotal experiences, and factual reporting — particularly when the narrative involves public figures or sensitive circumstances.

7. Spiritual Mediumship in Chinese Culture

Mediumship has a long history in Chinese traditions, encompassing roles in ancestor worship, exorcism, and spiritual guidance. In modern contexts, mediums often operate at the intersection of ritual practice, counseling, and cultural performance.

Celebrity deaths occasionally invite public consultation with mediums, blending grief, curiosity, and cultural symbolism. For audiences, such practices may provide a sense of closure or insight otherwise unavailable through conventional channels.

This cultural backdrop helps explain the medium’s influence and the public’s willingness to engage with their claims, even amid skepticism and legal ambiguity.

8. Legal and Ethical Considerations

Ethically, broadcasting unverified claims about an individual’s death carries risks. Media outlets and social media users bear responsibility to avoid defamation and sensationalism. Publicly naming individuals based solely on spiritual communication is legally and morally precarious.

Authorities typically rely on evidence-based investigation, not spiritual testimony. The case underscores the tension between public curiosity, cultural beliefs, and the standards of factual journalism. Responsible reporting requires distinguishing between anecdote and fact, while respecting the memory of the deceased.

9. Media Amplification and the Spread of Paranormal Claims

In the digital era, sensational claims spread rapidly. The medium’s session, emotional and controversial, was amplified by algorithms favoring high engagement. Viral dissemination often prioritizes attention-grabbing content over accuracy, resulting in the blending of speculation, grief, and belief.

Media analysts observe that such stories highlight both the power and danger of digital virality: public discourse can be shaped more by perception than evidence, reinforcing narratives that may never be verified.

10. Reflections on Grief, Perception, and Legacy

Ultimately, the episode surrounding Yu Menglong’s passing, the medium, and the alleged mastermind claim is as much about human psychology as it is about the facts. It illustrates how grief, celebrity culture, and cultural beliefs intersect in complex ways.

Fans continue to mourn, seek closure, and celebrate Yu Menglong’s contributions to entertainment. The medium’s revelations, dramatic as they are, offer a window into cultural coping mechanisms, communal memory, and the need for narrative in processing sudden loss.

Whether interpreted spiritually, symbolically, or critically, the story underscores the enduring influence of Yu Menglong’s life and the societal desire to find meaning in tragedy.

Conclusion

The claims made by the medium regarding Yu Menglong’s passing remain unverified. They reflect cultural approaches to grief, the public’s fascination with celebrity, and the amplification power of digital media. While the alleged revelations may offer comfort or closure for some, responsible reporting emphasizes the distinction between anecdotal spiritual experiences and verifiable facts.

Yu Menglong’s legacy — his performances, his music, and his impact on fans — remains unquestioned. The episode highlights the delicate balance between cultural expression, public curiosity, and journalistic responsibility in narrating the lives and deaths of public figures.

Remembering Yu Menglong: Tributes, Legacy, and Unfinished Projects
Mediums and the Supernatural in East Asian Pop Culture
The Ethics of Sharing Unverified Paranormal Claims Online