Arjo Atayde to pursue QC flood control project if he wins 2nd term |  INQUIRER.net

 

Arjo Atayde Draws Public Attention Amid Flood Control Scam Allegations — Public Speculates on Maine Mendoza’s Reaction

Date: September 9, 2025

Introduction

Congressman Arjo Atayde is once again at the center of controversy after being tagged in ongoing Senate investigations regarding the alleged misuse of public funds allocated to flood control projects under the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH). As this issue gains national attention, curiosity has also shifted toward his wife, actress and television personality Maine Mendoza, whose silence—or lack thereof—has led to widespread public speculation.

Reports falsely circulating online have suggested that Maine herself “revealed” information about the scandal. However, as of this writing, there is no verified statement or evidence that she has made any such claims.

The Core of the Allegations

Arjo Atayde’s name surfaced in a Senate hearing led by the Blue Ribbon Committee, where businessman and whistleblower Curlee Discaya testified about alleged extortion and kickbacks involving flood control infrastructure projects.

Atayde has since denied all allegations, claiming he has never participated in any form of corruption or misuse of funds. He also expressed willingness to cooperate with any investigation, reiterating his commitment to public service and transparency.

Maine Mendoza’s Public Statement: Setting the Record Straight

In the midst of these serious political allegations, Maine Mendoza issued a brief but firm public statement earlier this month urging the public not to rush to judgment based on incomplete or unverified information.

While her statement did not mention the flood control scandal directly, it appeared to address the growing narrative that she had turned against her husband or revealed insider information.

“I am not defending any wrongdoing, but I do hope we allow space for facts to come out first before forming judgments—especially when some of these stories are based on social media speculation and not on verified truths.”

This was seen by many as a call for fairness, not a confirmation or denial of the allegations against Atayde.

Social Media and the Spread of False Narratives

Amid the unfolding controversy, social media platforms became the breeding ground for misleading posts, clickbait headlines, and conspiracy theories—including the false claim that Maine Mendoza had “leaked” or “confirmed” her husband’s alleged wrongdoing.

Digital media watchdogs have warned against this kind of misinformation, especially when it involves public figures who are not officially part of the investigation.

Experts remind the public that trial by social media can damage reputations irreparably, especially when based on fabricated narratives.

Arjo Atayde’s Side and Legal Proceedings

In a press briefing held shortly after Discaya’s testimony, Atayde described the allegations as “baseless” and politically motivated. He said:

“I welcome any formal investigation. I have nothing to hide. My record as a public servant will speak for itself.”

Legal experts believe that if Atayde has nothing to do with the supposed irregularities, the formal inquiry will provide him the platform to clear his name.

Conclusion

While Congressman Arjo Atayde’s name remains entangled in one of the country’s biggest ongoing infrastructure-related investigations, no formal charges have been filed. His wife, Maine Mendoza, has clarified that she has not made any accusations nor confirmed any wrongdoing, contrary to what some viral posts have claimed.

As the Senate probe continues, both the legal process and responsible journalism will play key roles in separating fact from fiction.

Related Articles (For Further Reading):

    Arjo Atayde’s Response to Flood Control Project Allegations
    Maine Mendoza Urges Public Not to Judge Based on Online Speculation
    Curlee Discaya’s Testimony and What It Means for Lawmakers
    DPWH Flood Control Scandal: Timeline and Key Figures
    The Role of Misinformation in Politically Charged Investigations