President Rodrigo Duterte has finally spoken out: he publicly confirmed having instructed businessman Charlie “Atong” Ang to assist in matters connected to the Philippine Charity Sweepstakes Office—sparking intense debate and fresh scrutiny over his ties to a high-stakes gaming tycoon now under investigation for far graver allegations. As authorities close in on Atong Ang amid the missing sabungeros case, Duterte’s admission sends shockwaves across the political and investigative landscape.

A Moment of Revelation

In a rarely discussed 2018 disclosure, Duterte openly expressed that he personally called Atong Ang and urged him to help clean up corruption at the PCSO. “I called him. I said: ‘Atong, you are the number one gambler here in Davao… Let’s not fool each other,’” Duterte stated in a press conference, confirming the publicly known arrangement.

From Gambling Kingpin to Government Colluder

Atong Ang, a well-known figure in the gaming and cockfighting industries, rose to infamy not only for alleged illegal operations but also for his involvement in the Estrada impeachment drama. His closer connection with Duterte deepened public concern, especially when Duterte appointed him as a consultant for PCSO’s small-town lottery reforms—fuelling accusations of favoritism and cronyism .

The Missing Sabungeros Scandal

Recent whistleblower testimonies now allege that Atong Ang may have played a central role in the disappearance and possible murder of dozens of cockfight enthusiasts from Luzon. According to official reports, the Department of Justice and Philippine National Police are investigating over 100 potential fatalities tied to this crime ring—Ang and actress Gretchen Barretto are named suspects.

Duterte’s Words Under New Scrutiny

Did Duterte knowingly vouch for Ang, despite circulating rumors of murky operations?

Will Duterte’s instruction be viewed as assistance or fostering illicit activity?

Could political alliances shield key suspects as the investigation deepens?

What Comes Next

The DOJ and PNP are expected to issue statements addressing Duterte’s admission and its implications. Ang and Barretto are denying involvement, even suing former aides for defamation. But Duterte’s confirmation that he “told Atong what to do” casts a long, uncertain shadow over both the political and justice systems.

Final Thoughts

This revelation may prove to be a pivotal moment. It questions the extent to which political power influenced—or complicated—the handling of Atong Ang’s controversial dealings. With national interest at an all-time high, the narrative is shifting: from missing sabungeros to a tangled web of political patronage, accountability, and justice.

Will more damning facts emerge? Will Duterte respond again to the fallout? One thing’s certain: the nation is watching.