📰 Yu Menglong’s Agency May Permanently Lose License: 20 Pieces of Evidence Under Investigation

📅 Published on October 22, 2025

🔍 Introduction

The shocking death of actor Yu Menglong on September 11, 2025, has not only shaken fans across Asia but has also opened a Pandora’s box of controversy, implicating not just individuals but the powerful machinery behind celebrity management in China.

Now, with new developments coming to light, Yu Menglong’s talent agency is facing serious scrutiny. Allegations of abuse, misconduct, cover-ups, and possible criminal negligence have prompted a formal investigation into the agency’s operations.

If found guilty, the agency may face permanent revocation of its license—a rare but significant consequence that could send shockwaves through the entire entertainment industry.

📚 Table of Contents

The Rise of Yu Menglong and the Agency’s Influence
The Night of the Incident: Timeline and Inconsistencies
20 Key Pieces of Evidence Now Under Review
Allegations of Coercion, Abuse, and Control
Suppression of Whistleblowers and Witnesses
Censorship, Data Erasure, and Media Manipulation
Financial Misconduct and “Black Contracts”
Industry Reactions and Legal Ramifications
Government Oversight: What Could Happen Next?
Conclusion: A Reckoning for Power Structures in Showbiz

1. The Rise of Yu Menglong and the Agency’s Influence

Yu Menglong was once a rising star—admired not only for his roles in historical dramas and modern romances but also for his clean public image. Backed by one of the most prominent talent agencies in the mainland, he enjoyed rapid growth, brand endorsements, and cross-border appeal.

However, behind the polished reputation lay a system that insiders now describe as tightly controlled, profit-driven, and intolerant of defiance.

The agency was not just a management company—it was a gatekeeper to fame, financing productions, owning distribution rights, and reportedly exerting influence over media outlets and even law enforcement.

2. The Night of the Incident: Timeline and Inconsistencies

Yu Menglong was found dead after allegedly falling from the 9th floor of a luxury apartment building. The police declared it an accidental fall after alcohol consumption. But several inconsistencies emerged:

No toxicology results were publicly released.
Surveillance footage was allegedly missing.
Witness statements changed multiple times.
His mobile phone and personal journal were never returned to the family.

A growing segment of the public and several former staff members claim the agency moved quickly to suppress alternate narratives. These suspicions laid the groundwork for a full investigation.

3. 20 Key Pieces of Evidence Now Under Review

A leaked preliminary report by independent legal advisors mentions 20 pieces of evidence currently being reviewed. While the official list is confidential, sources close to the investigation highlight categories such as:

Digital records – Deleted texts, chat logs, and emails recovered from Yu’s cloud storage.
Autopsy inconsistencies – Physical injuries unrelated to a fall.
Financial transfers – Unusual payments made to third parties in the days before Yu’s death.
Contracts – Clauses allegedly violating labor law.
Surveillance tampering – Incomplete or edited footage from the building’s cameras.
Witness intimidation – Testimonies from building staff who reportedly changed stories after agency contact.
Missing phone – Yu’s phone was never returned to his family.
Red USB rumors – A flash drive allegedly containing confidential materials.
Agency-issued NDAs – Documents coercing silence from associates.
Mental health records – Claims of denied access to therapy.
Travel logs – Undisclosed visits to agency properties.
Bank statements – Evidence of offshore accounts.
Unlicensed security activity – Private guards with unclear authority.
Deleted social media posts – Posts wiped within minutes of being published.
Internal emails – Planning of PR responses before police statements.
Psychological manipulation – Testimonies of emotional abuse from former trainees.
Multiple restraining orders filed and sealed.
Medical supply records – Drugs allegedly unprescribed.
Corporate shell companies – Used to shift liability.
Staff confessions – Two anonymous letters sent to authorities.

This list, while incomplete, reveals the depth and scope of the inquiry.

4. Allegations of Coercion, Abuse, and Control

Several former agency trainees and minor celebrities have come forward—some anonymously—describing an environment of strict control and psychological manipulation.

Claims include:

Controlled diets and forced isolation
Seizing of personal phones and bank cards
Threats of career sabotage if trainees broke “moral codes”
Coerced participation in adult entertainment “sponsorship” events

While these accounts vary in detail, the recurring theme is clear: the agency reportedly viewed artists not as partners, but as products.

5. Suppression of Whistleblowers and Witnesses

Within hours of Yu Menglong’s death, at least two online influencers who questioned the official narrative had their accounts suspended. A former driver who claimed he had seen bruises on Yu days prior was reportedly detained for “spreading rumors.”

According to one anonymous employee, internal agency meetings were held to “control the flow of information” and prevent media “speculation.” These efforts, whether legal or not, raise troubling concerns about freedom of speech and witness protection.

6. Censorship, Data Erasure, and Media Manipulation

Several of Yu Menglong’s dramas were quietly removed from streaming platforms. Fan pages were deleted. Archived videos of past interviews disappeared. Entire threads discussing his case were wiped from local forums.

Insiders allege that the agency has long maintained relationships with tech companies and government censors to protect its image. These ties now appear to be working in reverse—drawing more suspicion than trust.

The public sees a pattern of erasure not as a coincidence, but as strategic silencing.

7. Financial Misconduct and “Black Contracts”

One of the more concrete accusations involves labor law violations and illegal contracts.

Documents obtained by investigators suggest that Yu Menglong may have signed contracts under coercion—contracts which:

Locked him into low pay relative to profits
Demanded performance with no sick leave
Restricted his ability to seek independent legal counsel

Some of these “black contracts” have been used before in other scandals in the industry. If proven, they would constitute criminal labor exploitation.

In addition, financial documents under review reportedly show irregularities such as:

Income misreporting
Transfer of royalties to undisclosed third parties
Unregistered payment channels abroad

8. Industry Reactions and Legal Ramifications

The entertainment industry has responded with cautious silence. Several agencies have issued internal memos advising staff to avoid discussing the matter.

However, a small number of actors have expressed solidarity with Yu’s family and demanded industry-wide reform. Privately, some producers fear this case could trigger stricter regulations and a restructuring of power dynamics.

Legal experts say the agency could face:

License suspension or permanent revocation
Multi-million yuan in damages to Yu’s estate
Blacklisting of executives from holding public or private directorships
Criminal charges for individual managers

9. Government Oversight: What Could Happen Next?

The Ministry of Culture and Tourism, along with the Labor Supervision Bureau, is reportedly involved in the multi-agency investigation. If the agency is found guilty of labor violations, psychological abuse, or financial fraud, it may be permanently stripped of its license.

This would be the first case of a top-tier agency being shut down since 2018.

Authorities are also reviewing whether negligence or criminal behavior contributed to Yu Menglong’s death. Though the threshold for criminal liability is high, the weight of 20 categories of evidence may prove decisive.

The central government has previously called for “moral purification” of the entertainment industry—this case may become its flagship moment.

10. Conclusion: A Reckoning for Power Structures in Showbiz

The tragedy of Yu Menglong’s death has evolved from personal loss to public awakening. His case has revealed a system that appears more invested in profit than protection, in suppression rather than transparency.

As investigations continue and evidence mounts, the fate of his agency hangs in the balance. But beyond one company, this case forces a deeper question:

How many more artists suffer in silence? And who holds power accountable when the lights go out?

The world is watching. Justice, if it comes, must not be selective.

📎 Related Articles

Behind the Spotlight: The Hidden Cost of Celebrity in China
Whistleblowers in the Entertainment Industry: A Dangerous Game
How Management Companies Control Image and Silence Critics
Yu Menglong’s Legacy: More Than Just a Tragic Ending
What If the System Is Broken? The Call for Showbiz Reform

It does not claim to represent real legal conclusions or official outcomes. All allegations mentioned are treated as speculative