Atong Ang Allegedly Gave ₱12 Million to “Alyas Totoy,” Who’s Now Revealing It: What’s the Truth?

July 7, 2025

I. Introduction

In the latest twist of the ongoing sabungero disappearance saga, controversial businessman Atong Ang has again come under intense scrutiny — this time for allegedly handing over a substantial ₱12 million to a man known only as “Alyas Totoy,” who recently gave a detailed interview, claiming the money was provided directly by Ang.

The revelations, made public by Totoy himself, suggest a deeper layer of financial entanglement that may tie Ang more directly to the disappearance investigation. With this claim emerging from a figure already considered pivotal, the question now is: What really happened? This article provides a comprehensive look into the background, credibility, context, and likely consequences of this explosive allegation.

II. Who Is Alyas Totoy?

“Alyas Totoy” is the alias used by a man recently identified as a key informant in the broader missing sabungero investigation. Though his real identity remains undisclosed, Totoy garnered attention after appearing in interviews describing what he knows and offering purported evidence related to the disappearances of multiple cockfighting figures over the past year.

He previously suggested having knowledge about business links and unconventional methods involving some missing sabungeros. His newly revealed claim — that Atong Ang gave him ₱12 million — raises questions about the nature of their relationship, the purpose of the payment, and whether it factors into the larger legal case.

III. The Explosion of the ₱12 Million Claim

In a recent interview, Totoy stated:

“I was given ₱12 million in cash by Atong Ang. He said it was for covering costs, expenses… but I know it was more than that.”

Totoy then went on to explain that Ang allegedly delivered the cash in person, at a discreet location outside Metro Manila, and that he still has records—like bank withdrawals, video footage of the transfer, and witness testimony—to back up his claims.

While Totoy did not specify an exact date, he said the transaction occurred shortly before one of the sabungero disappearances, suggesting a potential “quid pro quo” or some form of transaction related to the ongoing mayor-cockfighting figure investigation.

IV. What Does ₱12 Million Mean in This Context?

From meron to wala: Atong Ang's Pitmaster cuts free dialysis program with e-sabong shutdown - Bilyonaryo Business News

To interpret this claim properly, one must consider the sum: ₱12 million is roughly $210,000 USD — a substantial amount even for business or entertainment transactions in the Philippines.

For a payment to a private individual like Totoy, the amount suggests something more than reimbursement. It raises suspicions of possible compensation for sensitive information, witness cooperation, or potentially even hush money.

If verified, the transfer could indicate Ang’s deeper involvement in illegal networks beyond mere association — raising questions of influence, motive, and cover-up.

V. Evaluating Totoy’s Credibility

Assessing Totoy’s reliability is crucial in understanding the gravity of his claim. Critical questions include:

Does Totoy have tangible proof?
He claims to possess bank withdrawal slips, cash withdrawal records, and even video evidence. Law enforcement sources suggest authorities have requested these items.
What is his background?
Totoy’s past is murky. If he has criminal history or stake in the aftermath of the sabungero events, his motivation might come under scrutiny.
Is there a pattern of statements?
If his account of the ₱12M transaction aligns consistently with previous claims that were verified, that bolsters his credibility.

To date, no formal verification of Totoy’s documents or survival evidence has been made public.

VI. Has Atong Ang Responded?

Atong Ang has not personally responded to Totoy’s claim. His legal team issued a brief statement:

“We are aware of unverified allegations targeting Mr. Ang. We categorically deny any improper payment to the person referred to as ‘Alyas Totoy.’ All financial activities are lawful and transparent. We will cooperate fully with authorities to clarify any misunderstandings.”

The absence of a detailed rebuttal leaves the claim in limbo, placing responsibility on legal and investigative agencies to determine the truth.

VII. Legal and Ethical Implications

If Totoy’s allegations are corroborated, the legal implications could be significant:

Money Laundering: A large cash transaction could trigger anti-money laundering protocols, especially if undocumented or unaccounted for.
Obstruction or Hush Money: If intended to silence or influence Totoy regarding the sabungero disappearances, the payment may qualify as obstruction of justice.
Criminal Conspiracy: Coordinated financial exchanges tied to missing persons can hint at deeper criminal conspiracies or syndicates.

These allegations demand thorough legal scrutiny by authorities — with attention to financial records, transfers, communications, and motives.

VIII. The Investigation Process (Ongoing)

Law enforcement is reportedly taking several steps:

Summons or Custody

Forensic Accounting

Corroborative Statements

Third-party Deposits

IX. Context of the Missing Sabungero Investigation

The backdrop of this claim is an intense probe into multiple facets of organized cockfighting, gambling syndicates, corruption, and abductions.

Key developments thus far:

15 police officers are under restrictive custody for alleged roles in disappearance events.
Alleged vigilante actions and unauthorized detentions have been reported.
Patidongan and other informants have revealed financial irregularities.
Atong Ang’s name has appeared in several unofficial contexts, though never officially charged at this time.

The ₱12M claim, if validated, may provide the strongest direct link between Ang and the money trail around illicit operations.

X. Public Reaction and Media Narrative

As this allegation unfolds, public eyebrows have risen — prompting reactions such as:

Cautious skepticism from the public: Comments range from “Show evidence first!” to “This could be a big breakthrough.”
Fanbase mobilization: Social media hashtags like #12MillionMystery and #TotoySpeaks trend intermittently.
Media demands: Journalists are calling for official responses from the PNP, DOJ, and Anti-Money Laundering Council regarding Totoy’s documents.

There’s no consensus yet; many await formal confirmations.

XI. Possible Next Steps and Outcomes

Depending on investigation results, several scenarios may follow:

Documentation emerges

Partial verification

Failure to verify

XII. The Broader Fallout

The implications of this allegation reach beyond individuals:

Electoral impact: If the case involves public funds, political fallout may ensue.
Sabong industry: Already under scrutiny, any proven wrongdoing could lead to stricter regulation or clampdowns.
Business reputation: For Atong Ang, whose ventures span hospitality and real estate, credibility could suffer key erosion.

XIII. How to Stay Updated

For those following the story, essential information will come from:

Palace briefings or DOJ statements
PNP / AMLC disclosures
Court documents: Any denial or affidavit filed in court
Media reports: Credible outlets contacting authorities or reviewing records

XIV. Conclusion: A Case at a Crossroads

The allegation that Atong Ang gave ₱12 million to Alyas Totoy is potentially the most explosive development yet in a case already brimming with implications. But it remains unverified — and the stakes are high. If true, it may shift the investigation into a new, more incriminating phase. If disproven, it could be a major misstep with consequences for Totoy’s credibility.

What is clear: the truth will emerge only through due process — not rumor, but evidence. Authorities must carefully evaluate Totoy’s claims, verify his documents, and follow the money. Only then can this chapter find clarity, accountability, and justice.